{"id":"W1597925930","doi":"10.1111/1467-9671.00286","title":"Immigrant households and hardships after welfare reform: a case study of the Miami‐Dade Haitian community","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Welfare","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Miami; Poverty; Welfare; Welfare reform; Medicaid; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Government (linguistics); Social Welfare; Service (business); Unit (ring theory); Survey data collection; Political science; Business; Psychology; Economics; Health care","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110606,0.0001075965,0.0001915682,0.00008508276,0.001053548,0.0001106943,0.000438557,0.00009982297,0.0001730995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002139946,0.00007918626,0.0001404961,0.000190305,0.0002372556,0.0002405231,0.00006500023,0.000485462,4.246829e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001067077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01282586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1084966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975991,0.000946508,0.0004522805,0.00007699283,0.0007820135,0.0001430561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986071,0.00003520086,0.000447496,0.0001072189,0.0007177815,0.00008520141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000305844,0.001728655,0.05474184,0.0000293724,0.0006190469,0.001206125,0.8314189,0.0000266543,0.00005045591,0.1042097,0.0003869919,0.005276358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001427775,0.0001356242,0.1324697,0.00003022106,0.00007054139,0.0004393798,0.8140112,0.000008281365,0.00001499445,0.0003176111,0.05092816,0.0001464528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822229,0.00005157888,0.00000876516,0.01539108,0.0005939508,0.0001520205,0.00005783279,0.000008651708,0.001513256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.00002020439,0.00003378891,0.0002033437,0.0001471554,0.000004269803,0.000001209095,0.00001073708,0.0001720712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02238702237978285,"score_gpt":0.3048729143854019,"score_spread":0.2824858920056191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}