{"id":"W1597925930","doi":"10.1111/1467-9671.00286","title":"Immigrant households and hardships after welfare reform: a case study of the Miami‐Dade Haitian community","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Welfare","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Miami; Poverty; Welfare; Welfare reform; Medicaid; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Government (linguistics); Social Welfare; Service (business); Unit (ring theory); Survey data collection; Political science; Business; Psychology; Economics; Health care","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218953,0.0004149086,0.0004077527,0.001144565,0.01661157,0.002023759,0.0009718626,0.002187016,0.002628524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002558662,0.0003687253,0.0003461072,0.001848821,0.002262206,0.001294772,0.003831923,0.002060588,0.000202362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003871976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004463358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1518144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3655069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.0003800854,0.00002015707,0.00004091852,0.00005650435,0.0004004522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992179,0.0002164213,0.0001148535,0.00003457178,0.00008869073,0.0003275056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815019,0.001348213,0.1659289,0.0001904589,0.00005214801,0.03566233,0.7621258,0.0001659655,0.0006238589,0.00312378,0.003673371,0.02692357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001529289,0.0002370491,0.05291113,0.00008359121,0.00001889045,0.003200674,0.9383557,0.0001335217,0.00008285903,0.0001993764,0.004741529,0.00002040361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977918,0.0001673069,0.00002855636,0.0008727574,0.0000101626,0.00002958464,0.00001952917,0.000001238317,0.001079142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997376,0.0007895691,0.0001061594,0.0004916529,0.00001779985,0.00005018632,0.00003074465,0.000002543958,0.001135482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1518144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3018615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02238702237978285,"score_gpt":0.3048729143854019,"score_spread":0.2824858920056191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}