{"id":"W1598033492","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1151","title":"A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Skepticism; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Political science; Polity; Public law; Scholarship; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Politics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03135576,0.0004810129,0.001253946,0.006465073,0.00715156,0.01427777,0.001973231,0.004843219,0.004938728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06719483,0.0005770953,0.0007254381,0.004225979,0.07114425,0.03772242,0.007363179,0.008718676,0.0005007471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004824332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003721475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003933428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004108259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9737785,0.02085553,0.0005151351,0.001682156,0.002428477,0.0007401784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421383,0.04652723,0.001267255,0.005356773,0.003676905,0.001033615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002092782,0.000007617447,0.0002231139,0.0000665246,0.00001001916,0.00003155906,0.003697274,0.00007538476,0.00003344882,0.9785836,0.006187631,0.01106283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001564138,0.00001709884,0.0004077221,0.0001863239,0.000006078617,0.00005352584,0.002396197,0.0001988654,0.00006112191,0.951021,0.0456219,0.00001456106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02637617,0.1108736,0.07435592,0.5905889,0.004571429,0.0001114472,0.0001930409,0.0002161209,0.1927134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313909,0.0361582,0.04838546,0.05483278,0.01124125,0.0004720231,0.000137542,0.0004324226,0.01694938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03135576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.165827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06963996063123865,"score_gpt":0.3581375944494735,"score_spread":0.2884976338182348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}