{"id":"W1598251110","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1255","title":"Does the Observer Have an Effect?: An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Legislature; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784664,0.00009552653,0.0002665232,0.00003589386,0.001203163,0.00004732875,0.0005615663,0.00004528024,0.00003857475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002337284,0.00003498567,0.0002103002,0.0004507533,0.0007752943,0.0001877193,0.00006973602,0.0002400971,1.535396e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002174152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005201282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978369,0.0007206494,0.0003303257,0.0001099005,0.0007435437,0.0002587185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987962,0.0004612196,0.0002748111,0.000211469,0.0001727719,0.0000835479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003943606,0.00006660497,0.7096362,0.000001863666,0.0004503859,0.000008685877,0.002422828,0.001840283,0.00009575929,0.284085,0.0000491998,0.001303718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001505694,0.00002431161,0.9840513,0.00002558627,0.0005329612,0.000001870556,0.002947151,0.00008341589,0.000409313,0.008844203,0.002843794,0.00008554717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862146,0.0001587143,0.00001701183,0.001860652,0.000550753,0.0001672789,0.00004159431,0.000002758948,0.01098661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.00005102543,0.00001885064,0.0003224878,0.0001368757,0.000001925608,8.956545e-7,0.000003261413,0.00002895897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2752408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03993620394470653,"score_gpt":0.276923128913568,"score_spread":0.2369869249688615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}