{"id":"W1599418143","doi":"10.18926/fest/11431","title":"Laboratory Verification of a Proposed New Method to Determine the In-Situ Effective Porosity of Unsaturated Soil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Soil and Unsaturated Flow","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nuclear Waste Management Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Porosity; Saturation (graph theory); Wetting; Reflectometry; Soil water; Degree of saturation; Water content; Soil science; Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Mineralogy; Geology; Composite material; Time domain; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002794422,0.0001818989,0.0002480951,0.000127036,0.00008924669,0.00002452393,0.0001994148,0.00009856196,0.000003015299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001613165,0.0001443383,0.00004870628,0.0009120026,0.0001173178,0.0003260639,0.00004304755,0.0002049493,0.000004569337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001693509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002900299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001827043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006481117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987429,0.000091319,0.0004424764,0.0002283498,0.0003175365,0.0001773942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989945,0.0001715016,0.0001013272,0.000387375,0.0002807843,0.00006457093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001903624,0.00008331936,0.001660166,0.0001247289,0.00004602386,0.0000276734,0.0002084862,0.02838622,0.9613195,0.005030724,0.0009245922,0.001998188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004934745,0.00004706926,0.05863842,0.0001658512,0.00003413146,0.00001868283,0.00003424646,0.001653338,0.9352567,0.00008114,0.003404423,0.0001725303],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759597,0.0004417221,0.02000104,0.00007629278,0.0009645639,0.0005434898,0.0002885945,0.000115318,0.001609329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925323,0.000007890565,0.006844176,0.00001772826,0.0002708853,0.00003117349,0.0002423324,0.00001436655,0.00003913903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05697825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5885946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008279643920563498,"score_gpt":0.2379407130994701,"score_spread":0.2296610691789066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}