{"id":"W1600359060","doi":"10.53300/001c.6388","title":"Malicious Drugging and the Contaminated Catheter: Adams v Canadian Centre For Ethics in Sport","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sports Law and Governance Journal","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878347,0.0001106505,0.0002302773,0.00002769046,0.001302656,0.00008048082,0.000132991,0.0001286083,0.00003688958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106969,0.0000850697,0.00005285181,0.00009491057,0.0007146448,0.0002086205,0.00001486249,0.000468888,4.321094e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001930504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007915787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3672387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8111737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998688,0.00004307019,0.0002731683,0.0001648718,0.0003841929,0.0004467331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992369,0.00009245606,0.0002430485,0.00009414583,0.00009251179,0.000240885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007967785,0.00002633304,0.6623358,0.00001710407,0.00001447382,0.0008880041,0.05433691,0.00001061397,7.660916e-7,0.279101,0.001861738,0.001327547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001481025,0.00001864126,0.3990291,0.000215401,0.00002107177,0.0004315344,0.00324303,0.00003012485,0.0000033184,0.003264241,0.592049,0.0002134639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736599,0.001118346,0.000004812266,0.01285835,0.0005099842,0.0002995434,0.00001401165,0.00001310309,0.01152189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991605,0.003789887,0.00009612896,0.002167756,0.000223513,0.00000382916,0.000001647665,0.00001182725,0.002100379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5901873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01322156645117006,"score_gpt":0.260072052010011,"score_spread":0.2468504855588409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}