{"id":"W1601609006","doi":"","title":"A comparative study of the Floras of China and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Floristics; Disjunct; Flora (microbiology); Ordination; Geography; Ecology; Disjunct distribution; Species richness; China; Biology; Archaeology; Population; Paleontology; Demography; Phylogenetic tree","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000217443,0.0002111021,0.0001829609,0.00345051,0.002113504,0.0008401361,0.0002633289,0.0001033402,0.001814924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053268,0.00009408729,0.0002084023,0.005308709,0.0004714904,0.0002780644,0.0005879903,0.0001509472,0.00006727958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005251633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007153574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8606862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9598912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997271,0.00001699739,0.00001032835,0.00005188761,0.00008799534,0.0001057266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996703,0.0000334344,0.00005245542,0.00001212194,0.0001323393,0.00009932082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002933938,0.00002545477,0.8447559,0.000357459,0.0002039426,0.001178171,0.01164173,0.0003771045,0.01836914,0.002114325,0.001426799,0.1192566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002347427,0.0000117298,0.992859,0.00001644573,0.00001598213,0.0001575221,0.001775009,0.0001140537,0.0002436482,0.00004795285,0.004748669,0.000007758374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926335,0.001466762,0.0001424594,0.0000681036,0.000006743632,0.00001134287,0.0005910415,0.00001074238,0.005069165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966067,0.0009043101,0.0005377711,0.00003889332,0.000003464878,0.000005970709,0.000749994,0.000005200618,0.001147828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1393138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2802684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2227035787180535,"score_gpt":0.4719329936960012,"score_spread":0.2492294149779478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}