{"id":"W1601967655","doi":"10.1023/a:1012295301541","title":"Use of Stable Isotope Ratios for Evaluating Sulfur Sources and Losses at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Air & Soil Pollution","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Weathering; Deposition (geology); Precipitation; Environmental science; Watershed; Outflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Drainage; Mineralization (soil science); Environmental chemistry; Atmospheric sciences; Geology; Sediment; Chemistry; Geochemistry; Oceanography; Geomorphology; Soil science; Soil water; Ecology; Meteorology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008175619,0.0003723396,0.0003985023,0.001068504,0.002489153,0.0008110568,0.001097497,0.000460697,0.001009888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006745038,0.0003943348,0.0002127926,0.0007443676,0.0008038388,0.0005385579,0.0003491188,0.0006833914,0.000193011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00619663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002405866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5191208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8309045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996775,0.00005634915,0.00001210428,0.00009429904,0.0001127548,0.00004695543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990382,0.0002015087,0.0001274183,0.000054939,0.0003977609,0.0001801171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033893,0.0009518653,0.7258229,0.00006953486,0.000278026,0.0003037329,0.0007743021,0.005463713,0.2339158,0.000770858,0.00129647,0.02696356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001421807,0.0003118533,0.8827422,0.00001488835,0.0001963992,0.000123584,0.0005503159,0.01523296,0.09851284,0.0002691863,0.001860311,0.00004325867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983971,0.00007876817,0.0004882262,0.00003086784,0.000005814754,0.00001444494,0.0002970943,0.00002905257,0.0006586869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952102,0.0001145211,0.002319874,0.00002718595,0.000003103186,0.00003055968,0.0004666687,0.00002432171,0.001803569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5191208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9674225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02998032205521457,"score_gpt":0.2529904813985442,"score_spread":0.2230101593433297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}