{"id":"W1602355655","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v120i2.284","title":"Conservation Evaluation of the Small-flowered Tonella, <em>Tonella tenella</em>, in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disjunct; Endangered species; Outcrop; Threatened species; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Archaeology; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Paleontology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004294741,0.0001369115,0.0001515869,0.0009692475,0.002044079,0.0008372937,0.001029117,0.0002071629,0.002496296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009822559,0.00009988211,0.0001012901,0.001057718,0.0007539942,0.0002244125,0.0004422037,0.0002137968,0.0001237047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009628504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008573013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9612513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996661,0.0000352744,0.000008774717,0.00005289718,0.0001409128,0.0000960605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990453,0.00005824622,0.000116853,0.00002657095,0.0003654367,0.0003875902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009942726,0.0004057534,0.7739998,0.0003869847,0.000115,0.001580103,0.00516874,0.001803461,0.0129272,0.001489553,0.01002607,0.1911032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002916596,0.0001903814,0.9809018,0.00004443703,0.00004493713,0.0002686503,0.006542653,0.001044645,0.0007334569,0.00008536562,0.01009947,0.00001514785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987964,0.0004995833,0.0001469267,0.0004106381,0.00001054427,0.00006196361,0.0004012622,0.00001738927,0.01048758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958169,0.0002314672,0.0004033219,0.0001101593,0.000001806621,0.0000115393,0.0002682896,0.000004151259,0.003152374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03874874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07795382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02457785292560225,"score_gpt":0.2037289377281185,"score_spread":0.1791510848025163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}