{"id":"W1602982496","doi":"10.1029/2002wr001685","title":"Comparison of two fitting methods for the log‐logistic distribution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quantile; Estimator; Statistics; Mathematics; Log-logistic distribution; Logistic distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Maximum likelihood; Probability distribution; Logistic regression; Distribution fitting; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005557886,0.00006987913,0.0001625731,0.00003207875,0.000515043,0.00002617824,0.0003333787,0.00005908624,0.001062416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006367342,0.00003711939,0.00007798844,0.0002642417,0.0006796162,0.00003951509,0.0001682189,0.0002349549,0.0001207937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005413948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003210398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004217265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007959375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.001029605,0.0002249537,0.0002221091,0.0002833481,0.0004345544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984185,0.001183094,0.00003786957,0.0002859196,0.00002517112,0.00004949061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000347283,0.0005793444,0.6632259,0.00009250741,0.0002996961,0.000006046052,0.01948905,0.07273138,0.1510766,0.003945337,0.007924278,0.08028254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005672254,0.0002348294,0.005209197,0.000008110818,0.00007656772,0.000003728872,0.0008829265,0.1130899,0.2880902,0.0133647,0.5782998,0.0001727839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392813,0.0002673132,0.1533111,0.0006400524,0.00003825317,0.0003335785,0.000007045679,0.00001389567,0.006107469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954303,0.000004425845,0.003305988,0.00001720518,0.0000219048,0.00004539966,0.00001498628,0.000005969986,0.001153834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6580167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1457735686056568,"score_gpt":0.4815888922872537,"score_spread":0.3358153236815969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}