{"id":"W1602982496","doi":"10.1029/2002wr001685","title":"Comparison of two fitting methods for the log‐logistic distribution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quantile; Estimator; Statistics; Mathematics; Log-logistic distribution; Logistic distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Maximum likelihood; Probability distribution; Logistic regression; Distribution fitting; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009989335,0.001045499,0.0008508004,0.003352669,0.000589819,0.001270342,0.002001237,0.001662584,0.002853142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05753225,0.0006654248,0.001420713,0.002529061,0.0006363422,0.002032262,0.001628821,0.001339202,0.001101981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001026148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009099239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005204909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003118524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959695,0.002618058,0.0001669862,0.0002895451,0.0007957074,0.0001601859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734248,0.02091032,0.001294371,0.001850053,0.002242364,0.0002781101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007990022,0.0002921392,0.02806314,0.0004447764,0.0004793474,0.000266376,0.001139549,0.4076222,0.003444193,0.03367715,0.003735774,0.5200363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000739882,0.00009972308,0.006971231,0.00006733183,0.00004726735,0.0002300818,0.0001988903,0.9766408,0.001924698,0.011482,0.002170525,0.00009360124],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04783428,0.000366051,0.9484594,0.0002455611,0.00003831259,0.0001235721,0.0001287611,0.001660136,0.001143934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4419402,0.0006374821,0.5527137,0.000146394,0.00005488178,0.0006281576,0.0009499291,0.001264511,0.001664711],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009989335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05282927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1457735686056568,"score_gpt":0.4815888922872537,"score_spread":0.3358153236815969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}