{"id":"W1603305013","doi":"10.3989/scimar.2001.65s199","title":"Larval trophodynamics, turbulence, and drift on Georges Bank: A sensitivity analysis of Cod and Haddock","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Marina","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; European Commission; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Haddock; Larva; Turbulence; Sensitivity (control systems); Biology; Environmental science; Oceanography; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Meteorology; Engineering; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003785503,0.000120571,0.0002419335,0.0001177003,0.0001699174,0.00007269821,0.00008539704,0.00004588174,0.0002434311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003793618,0.00009670931,0.00005763198,0.001331963,0.0003645747,0.0001652584,0.00002993878,0.0000803858,0.000004788429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001273851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002356967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001134124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002683997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989764,0.00004424854,0.0001432302,0.000351052,0.0002464194,0.0002386265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.0001052925,0.00007984894,0.0001551406,0.00004691524,0.0001162623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000381211,0.00002338176,0.9861981,0.00001667301,0.00009847866,0.0000227973,0.00007062023,0.0008214876,0.00001912664,0.000127472,0.00004401932,0.01251971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391982,0.0001019248,0.9208497,0.00001043748,0.0001736548,0.00001371628,0.00008711338,0.07718609,0.00002108738,0.0003414623,0.0009582724,0.0001173121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966072,0.0004532645,0.0001151652,0.0001263287,0.0001064048,0.00006008567,0.00006380081,0.00002138125,0.002446373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983854,0.0005283007,0.0005857024,0.00006217003,0.00001426136,1.675076e-7,0.00004224241,0.000001824835,0.0003799244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07636461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3943692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004842448368216071,"score_gpt":0.1854090821447966,"score_spread":0.1805666337765806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}