{"id":"W1603968196","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2146","title":"Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Falsity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Deontic logic; Informal logic; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003830218,0.0001010937,0.00009738215,0.00002539839,0.000834638,0.0002932805,0.0003288884,0.00006685757,0.0001124863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001424042,0.00006521727,0.00005772317,0.0002256623,0.0004358854,0.0009193622,0.00007207744,0.0002110174,0.000313112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009967029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005395212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002049706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006294598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988594,0.00002688143,0.0001796242,0.00012243,0.0003998202,0.0004118344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995945,0.00005810103,0.00007232005,0.00009237145,0.00007979209,0.0001029051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004596584,0.00004841692,0.00009179168,0.00001304884,0.00001519466,0.00002524556,0.04181278,0.0265203,0.00006682279,0.9294754,0.00006226353,0.001822727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002365466,0.000978251,0.001425797,0.0001620983,0.00009373394,0.00006574795,0.09589697,0.01844637,0.002561082,0.8620263,0.01480689,0.001171282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3703643,0.0001427471,0.01141988,0.00422372,0.0002056981,0.0004969753,0.000005585931,0.0001550062,0.6129861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971069,0.00009658984,0.0004823128,0.001601919,0.00008774052,0.00003104532,0.000001030044,0.000004532924,0.0005879242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6419445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04565963387652131,"score_gpt":0.3730706715448779,"score_spread":0.3274110376683566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}