{"id":"W1603968196","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2146","title":"Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Falsity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Deontic logic; Informal logic; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01432526,0.0009611364,0.001197184,0.004451574,0.005140333,0.01300618,0.003849459,0.009453412,0.00652644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01344188,0.0009755191,0.00151384,0.003058048,0.02698675,0.01720699,0.007919458,0.005295049,0.002033647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006661234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004833824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00232683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001896989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984665,0.009089177,0.0006340118,0.001301834,0.003509751,0.0008003795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881479,0.007738768,0.0008127746,0.001392511,0.001228367,0.0006796225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002952722,0.000007084265,0.00002588686,0.00001073718,0.000001924375,0.00002341566,0.0005022179,0.0002225815,0.00004046539,0.9985707,0.0001011997,0.0004908206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152019,0.000005140904,0.00002286535,0.00002007321,0.000003984695,0.00003401898,0.0001847854,0.002793922,0.00006207319,0.9933374,0.003515762,0.000004824783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04187705,0.001973142,0.5812969,0.04139902,0.0002739157,0.0003836229,0.0002694762,0.0002672833,0.3322596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605579,0.00110177,0.1162318,0.002309757,0.0003106272,0.0006578713,0.0001425112,0.0001303057,0.01855763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01432526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07576013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04565963387652131,"score_gpt":0.3730706715448779,"score_spread":0.3274110376683566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}