{"id":"W1606051823","doi":"10.3138/jcs.42.3.80","title":"A Long-Standing Canadian Tradition: Citizenship Revocation and Second-Class Citizenship under the Liberals, 1993-2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Revocation; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Politics; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law; Good citizenship; Political science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009633582,0.0001243288,0.000281857,0.001825773,0.003907767,0.0002213061,0.0002225693,0.0001036872,0.0002844816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000294278,0.0001236734,0.0001064534,0.0007281799,0.001217053,0.0002056989,0.000007860366,0.000338314,0.00001254604],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006482866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9539095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984263,0.000219349,0.0003606075,0.0001386688,0.0003759325,0.0004791393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980731,0.0002321646,0.0002184745,0.0001216451,0.0003462597,0.001008362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009607181,0.000003672235,0.002599867,0.00002605938,0.0003114894,0.000546098,0.03019159,0.000009008227,0.000003970138,0.0489305,0.9164354,0.0009327335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005264296,0.00007937676,0.130379,0.0001720619,0.0001440408,0.0005047055,0.04457026,0.000001700405,0.000002929239,0.02051078,0.80273,0.0003788073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6318865,0.04796473,0.00000957893,0.1266796,0.00266847,0.0004327622,0.0002407536,0.00002621199,0.1900914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807645,0.006100935,0.00002649981,0.003609951,0.00100117,0.000004670404,0.00000226819,0.00001496561,0.008475042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.348878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07635882854658403,"score_gpt":0.2687179056637614,"score_spread":0.1923590771171774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}