{"id":"W1606286286","doi":"10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09805.x","title":"Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: a population‐based case‐cohort study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Urology","topic":"Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; Canada Research Chairs; Cancer Care Ontario; Cancer Research Institute","keywords":"Medicine; Prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Lymph node; Lymphadenectomy; Hazard ratio; Proportional hazards model; Population; Lymph; Cohort; Confounding; Cancer; Biochemical recurrence; Androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate-specific antigen; Oncology; Internal medicine; Urology; Confidence interval; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006823697,0.000708528,0.002153938,0.001305696,0.0007472856,0.00152926,0.001531346,0.001735869,0.003454305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02091981,0.001108935,0.002727269,0.00259411,0.0007542378,0.001457068,0.0006449632,0.001195059,0.0004652501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008414937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008443749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003112364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002403694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938602,0.002493362,0.001155116,0.001395469,0.0007586172,0.0003371204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833909,0.006802878,0.005033414,0.002908567,0.001339631,0.0005246694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002652949,0.0002782634,0.9801111,0.001442573,0.006262327,0.00125695,0.0002387158,0.0002120036,0.0003533492,0.0001998172,0.001091614,0.005900381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263495,0.002728334,0.9713821,0.001689805,0.0104409,0.006805485,0.000696546,0.001421477,0.0002320157,0.0007240532,0.002469882,0.0001459921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.965593,0.02617279,0.002689741,0.0003668825,0.0002057428,0.0009964355,0.002190744,0.00002779462,0.00175686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950081,0.002551853,0.000640002,0.0001816497,0.0001339099,0.0004196809,0.0009057468,0.00001191164,0.000147035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006823697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03608763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01099011196483241,"score_gpt":0.2824674364306,"score_spread":0.2714773244657676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}