{"id":"W1606510676","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12033","title":"Political Consumerism in Context: An Experiment on Status and Information in Ethical Consumption Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Consumerism; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Economics; Business; Public economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003938551,0.00008763951,0.0003000243,0.0001920637,0.00005336109,0.0000913956,0.00005368527,0.0001047487,0.00001540188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002757124,0.00007938789,0.00003052511,0.00003288467,0.0006234482,0.0008752939,0.00002918802,0.00030333,0.000005339781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001254106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005204617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002288367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001279814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991482,0.00005932917,0.0004169696,0.00008541435,0.00003106218,0.0002589749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.0002264817,0.0002393329,0.00005127185,0.00007578699,0.00006048058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368728,0.000107856,0.290951,0.000009720837,0.00002021811,0.000003066307,0.005138882,0.00005545445,0.000004651744,0.6784455,0.00002855504,0.02509819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001406306,0.0003580399,0.803377,0.00001938717,0.00001156447,0.00000661996,0.09503367,0.00120988,0.000001008448,0.09724622,0.001168779,0.000161529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959363,0.00005845636,0.000007705999,0.003536198,0.00008853337,0.0001057692,0.000002156731,0.000002701526,0.0002621249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938239,0.0003093068,0.00005562774,0.005736236,0.00006392725,0.000003172925,0.000003674891,0.000003784126,3.426556e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5811993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3459342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02652284522260974,"score_gpt":0.299650270894761,"score_spread":0.2731274256721513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}