{"id":"W1606539988","doi":"10.1002/mpr.1392","title":"Validation of the problem gambling severity index using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch modelling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Rasch model; Differential item functioning; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Measurement invariance; Index (typography); Population; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Sample (material); Item response theory; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Structural equation modeling; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05289404,0.001775813,0.001571587,0.003378134,0.001473544,0.001828344,0.001435601,0.0008288263,0.001649705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1123738,0.0008405669,0.003103619,0.003012101,0.00127553,0.001062305,0.001759743,0.002390671,0.0006348726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006120808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01899625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02194356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9767111,0.01549895,0.001585398,0.001370315,0.004263644,0.0005706006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9264486,0.04189082,0.003169731,0.006626645,0.02106391,0.0008001565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001610313,0.002007635,0.7388358,0.0006475968,0.001673272,0.0005141807,0.01005641,0.02913767,0.003995438,0.009216974,0.004604805,0.1976998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009917958,0.00367529,0.709536,0.0005196289,0.0008248193,0.0003573358,0.002877851,0.2565197,0.003608229,0.01329535,0.007540034,0.0002539872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8164419,0.0002252153,0.1691543,0.0003408696,0.0001490085,0.007369707,0.001499357,0.0005098713,0.004309746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8705544,0.000138655,0.1196881,0.00007236998,0.00002861691,0.006319266,0.002192334,0.0001008304,0.0009054499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05289404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2797338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3520216114632962,"score_gpt":0.5843666618238835,"score_spread":0.2323450503605873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}