{"id":"W1607039108","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2010.11076834","title":"Comparison of Ergonomic Risk Assessment Output in Four Sawmill Jobs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Risk assessment; Human factors and ergonomics; Work (physics); Threshold limit value; Index (typography); Statistics; Poison control; Operations management; Engineering; Occupational safety and health; Physical therapy; Mathematics; Medicine; Environmental health; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008414822,0.0001094094,0.0003481308,0.000317002,0.00003367569,0.00001667156,0.0001434402,0.0001015642,0.00006772242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003932683,0.00009434808,0.0001633146,0.00006209243,0.0001041912,0.0001959528,0.00003973667,0.0004784537,0.000002657341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001514872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000303866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005328464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001149382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984131,0.00005623062,0.0009895356,0.0001236945,0.000320895,0.00009658547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982461,0.0003665229,0.0007075753,0.00009429381,0.0004882054,0.00009727633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009815157,0.0003244046,0.9618925,0.00004016132,0.0001783953,0.000003528282,0.0002491981,0.002697853,0.002745506,0.003239882,0.000113237,0.01870022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002075064,0.0002444249,0.9873241,0.00008657941,0.00002944007,0.00003665868,0.0001244237,0.007065809,0.000134105,0.0002977548,0.002500433,0.00008119394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949957,0.00005874176,0.002780938,0.0005710822,0.001052334,0.0001205004,0.0000384489,0.000003597474,0.0003786996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870905,0.0002314612,0.01216145,0.00008937097,0.0003477116,0.000001482781,0.00002795061,0.000008990233,0.00004112132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02543166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3847403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02439547373959472,"score_gpt":0.3700489538470117,"score_spread":0.345653480107417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}