{"id":"W1607081849","doi":"","title":"A cognitive and user centric based approach for reverse engineering tool design","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reverse engineering; Software engineering; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Visualization; Software maintenance; Cognition; Systems engineering; Software; Human–computer interaction; Software system; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001360042,0.000228174,0.0003654365,0.0002155766,0.0003797525,0.0001061305,0.0007715639,0.00006432219,0.000005931631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01054325,0.0001710064,0.0000734113,0.001640242,0.0002800222,0.0002547222,0.000224031,0.0002751518,0.000002687682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004218532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000110867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001541341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975479,0.0002722808,0.000265026,0.0006008099,0.0006347108,0.0006793041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871562,0.008846857,0.00007185457,0.0004696729,0.003351095,0.0001043553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009513068,0.002052909,0.001743447,0.005221516,0.00215542,0.00002541664,0.02379698,0.6011192,0.01303808,0.08674219,0.02607379,0.2285179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01065418,0.002565504,0.001006585,0.001764319,0.00005823042,0.000002645643,0.006016011,0.8012564,0.15217,0.001901553,0.02149242,0.001112199],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02240984,0.001152604,0.9670627,0.00172977,0.0001995751,0.007026221,0.0002195431,0.0001123789,0.00008741966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7621124,0.0004580731,0.2338323,0.0000526689,0.00005317281,0.001546218,0.000007110081,0.00004360971,0.001894424],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7397026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09761189240360622,"score_gpt":0.3567598523529033,"score_spread":0.2591479599492971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}