{"id":"W1607143840","doi":"10.1023/a:1013771109591","title":"A statistical evaluation of non-ergodic variogram estimators","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","topic":"Soil Geostatistics and Mapping","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Variogram; Estimator; Geostatistics; Kriging; Mathematics; Ergodic theory; Statistics; Skewness; Spatial analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Spatial variability; Econometrics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003488701,0.0001605115,0.0002052019,0.00002214074,0.0001394757,0.00001899711,0.00009619865,0.0000819342,0.03053337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001090744,0.0001388152,0.00002299862,0.00006217667,0.0005490222,0.00005772026,0.0001427724,0.0001176027,0.000533274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001245554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002920357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006700438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002217407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984803,0.00007921599,0.0003033812,0.0003168289,0.0005376466,0.0002826751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993596,0.0002341928,0.0001038079,0.0001261622,0.000003906824,0.0001723354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002632515,0.001561106,0.3268229,0.00003249338,0.00005799905,0.00006554752,0.0005619625,0.002801645,0.001968636,0.002101433,0.01365657,0.6503434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005200082,0.000293184,0.7575822,0.000003342423,0.00008667676,0.00001164926,0.00005944711,0.2328599,0.00003135243,0.007528733,0.0008437327,0.0001797496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.890292,0.00007577727,0.1037292,0.00003396688,0.0001147703,0.00039971,0.0005594137,0.00002008003,0.004775071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530093,0.0001160829,0.04656111,0.00008515507,0.00001077607,0.000028754,0.00005243642,0.000009635044,0.0001267241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6501637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9703528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01986644169900743,"score_gpt":0.2367966744460741,"score_spread":0.2169302327470667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}