{"id":"W1607756100","doi":"","title":"Age and Ageism in Sentencing Practices: Outcomes from a Case Law Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Transparency (behavior); Judicial discretion; Sentence; Accountability; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Population; Sentencing guidelines; Criminal law; Age discrimination; Psychology; Judicial review; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01782363,0.0002336599,0.0008155291,0.01229144,0.002009534,0.002906282,0.001057402,0.001114867,0.001305313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08315369,0.0004530996,0.0008718789,0.01948878,0.001432723,0.001601204,0.001356337,0.0009103345,0.0002711799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01531172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03334101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1925512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4462112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838808,0.005923851,0.002664858,0.0006957433,0.006001788,0.0008329964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8823397,0.07236705,0.0188427,0.00140286,0.02393095,0.001116758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007120649,0.000735622,0.4393742,0.04727749,0.001801235,0.009235901,0.05440772,0.0006968264,0.0007700332,0.01058688,0.0478304,0.3865716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001277075,0.0005510431,0.6939427,0.07163682,0.005049277,0.008252041,0.06043123,0.0004362776,0.0009331789,0.001293815,0.1571046,0.0002413246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.455628,0.5118358,0.0007616329,0.005668461,0.0001972931,0.002483065,0.004870849,0.00001965615,0.01853512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5806586,0.4115197,0.001516568,0.001748311,0.0001822868,0.001052383,0.00180465,0.00002486961,0.001492706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1925512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3828608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03174858494594278,"score_gpt":0.3376378695276296,"score_spread":0.3058892845816868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}