{"id":"W1610192464","doi":"10.18227/1983-9065ex.v7i2.2412","title":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E O DIREITO INTERNACIONAL: UMA ANÁLISE JURISPRUDENCIAL","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"EXAMÃPAKU","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Continental (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Philosophy; Political science; Humanities; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004964441,0.0005375445,0.0004221121,0.00008950409,0.0004786807,0.0002218783,0.0009243222,0.0002635881,0.02191831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009071177,0.0005298224,0.0003225572,0.0001509044,0.0005684822,0.0005130274,0.0007204539,0.0004724944,0.01313071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006021357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002586585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001921272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004647351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963069,0.0002604522,0.0006214849,0.0007711541,0.001205368,0.0008346277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986683,0.0001847596,0.0002313409,0.0004963945,0.00001446731,0.0004048027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001451158,0.003524206,0.2516049,0.000188424,0.000586523,0.0002249562,0.007879886,0.004027158,0.05028096,0.2003601,0.378954,0.1009178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184778,0.0004076441,0.220735,0.00008605997,0.00004367381,0.00006556403,0.00007917765,0.003659738,0.006457501,0.0009951424,0.7655044,0.0007812634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.737179,0.0001694473,0.0009997027,0.002045675,0.002539424,0.0003490715,0.0002370192,0.00009491629,0.2563857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134271,0.0000608679,0.0002008095,0.002032874,0.001516884,0.00002134149,0.00008234486,0.00006107539,0.0825967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3865505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009498567440678328,"score_gpt":0.2423801689256622,"score_spread":0.2328816014849839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}