{"id":"W161617749","doi":"10.1093/njaf/18.3.87","title":"Developing and Validating Nonlinear Height–Diameter Models for Major Tree Species of Ontario's Boreal Forests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Boreal; Statistics; Sigmoid function; Asymptote; Forestry; Ecology; Geometry; Geography; Biology; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003289959,0.0001557893,0.0002780122,0.00006136353,0.0001082377,0.0000188797,0.0002380641,0.00009222043,0.0001499127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001214829,0.0001278844,0.00009037603,0.00008487275,0.0001717102,0.0001959561,0.0001270272,0.0001647937,0.000004975892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002263897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007623134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005451174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07255179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988331,0.000009121119,0.0004806089,0.0001748268,0.0002320793,0.0002703055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992843,0.00006739586,0.0003990477,0.0001364332,0.00002668881,0.00008613725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009169183,0.0001882386,0.9353263,0.0000719859,0.0002274614,0.00005413216,0.002816798,0.02224043,0.0002639369,0.01883771,0.0003880703,0.01866795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003087284,0.0005671341,0.7899785,0.00008328341,0.0001760707,0.000108084,0.0005651414,0.002944534,0.002050199,0.1892307,0.01075848,0.0004506131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511663,0.00001828023,0.03301435,0.0001072154,0.00007407932,0.0002433388,0.00000394787,0.000006568753,0.01536595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431457,0.0000182397,0.0562773,0.00008467321,0.00007898761,0.00001163147,0.000006073655,0.00001840915,0.0003590161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1703929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01926898404730027,"score_gpt":0.2219301978440181,"score_spread":0.2026612137967178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}