{"id":"W1617831777","doi":"10.4086/cjtcs.2016.013","title":"Optimal bounds for quantum weak oblivious transfer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Oblivious transfer; Alice (programming language); Alice and Bob; Computer science; Transfer (computing); Upper and lower bounds; Cryptography; Quantum; Cryptographic protocol; Quantum cryptography; Discrete mathematics; Protocol (science); Point (geometry); Coin flipping; Mathematics; Quantum information; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121074,0.002754733,0.00290736,0.003891871,0.004002948,0.00825565,0.00489198,0.004371143,0.01112919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05713289,0.00171644,0.001971246,0.003318574,0.01138071,0.01863169,0.01226075,0.01295185,0.002255213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01122532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004878227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001382608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001222369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842225,0.004143083,0.0005683422,0.002504554,0.005442182,0.00311942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442051,0.04167758,0.002129175,0.007298631,0.002643049,0.002046445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003733123,0.0000968131,0.0003561543,0.0001980946,0.000041299,0.00005636448,0.0002556384,0.03290713,0.002127118,0.9481427,0.004053837,0.01139155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003740779,0.00004295042,0.0001412099,0.00007442124,0.00002823696,0.00003809013,0.00005561904,0.08950356,0.001693075,0.9057425,0.002606898,0.00003593543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08552418,0.007006961,0.7599809,0.01587045,0.0005948254,0.0003505132,0.0009882431,0.001272811,0.1284112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607139,0.003981845,0.1137276,0.002317159,0.001005454,0.0009982593,0.0006526631,0.0008699037,0.01573321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08144581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04041892535300748,"score_gpt":0.1864127277364972,"score_spread":0.1459938023834897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}