{"id":"W1619354738","doi":"10.2172/889645","title":"Kootenai River Focus Watershed Coordination, 2002-2003 Annual Report.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Watershed; Watershed management; Work (physics); Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Public administration; Environmental science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030425,0.001086713,0.0004563209,0.002470813,0.002169141,0.003483446,0.002226881,0.001005912,0.1082174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002988588,0.0008246727,0.0002376996,0.005697362,0.0002662181,0.001781701,0.001905599,0.0007978053,0.03949874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007165855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02868269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4163681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4995448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.0001367908,0.0001222918,0.0002000797,0.0008452447,0.0002036212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971133,0.00008565212,0.0001548078,0.00009102729,0.002160708,0.0003944212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004211455,0.00003049582,0.001464825,0.0001084399,0.000003621481,0.00003841755,0.00009067113,0.00008928542,0.0000824434,0.0004125829,0.9835204,0.01411668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963233,0.00001338377,0.01147569,0.0001249005,0.000006511925,0.00003956266,0.0005812934,0.0001062282,0.0001805584,0.000153149,0.9872872,0.00001185006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008878604,0.005442586,0.002303509,0.01019564,0.002736669,0.00178152,0.5407857,0.002133345,0.4257424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01852314,0.004647308,0.00444072,0.001392734,0.0001687066,0.002099739,0.435918,0.000828537,0.5319811],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4163681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8278891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0110967782080555,"score_gpt":0.231086515442027,"score_spread":0.2199897372339716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}