{"id":"W1624057527","doi":"10.25011/cim.v30i4.2815","title":"54. Assessing cardiac physical examination competence using simulation technology and real patientss","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical and investigative medicine","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Physical examination; Precordial examination; Modalities; Competence (human resources); Physical therapy; Objective structured clinical examination; Physical exam; Comprehension; Modality (human–computer interaction); Medical diagnosis; Internal medicine; Electrocardiography; Medical education; Pathology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004330085,0.0001650028,0.0001609916,0.0005093201,0.000234126,0.0006913112,0.0002185202,0.0002149595,0.004990084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01625325,0.00009683317,0.0002257999,0.0001955835,0.0004635239,0.0004951563,0.000814705,0.0002231358,0.0009547376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000453845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004537907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001717605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002144895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970376,0.00148068,0.0002841851,0.0002617586,0.0007572048,0.0001785039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990877,0.004754073,0.001465618,0.0004668723,0.00180495,0.000631456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003845035,0.0006346187,0.9256507,0.0001404214,0.00006382072,0.0002005051,0.001851943,0.0007130214,0.005693625,0.000289701,0.001314621,0.06306238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004258006,0.002503302,0.9867567,0.00008285544,0.00002667533,0.0004494411,0.001401025,0.001800457,0.003860119,0.000157295,0.002894123,0.00002562899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990333,0.000185344,0.001053016,0.0001607904,0.00002667835,0.00008351583,0.0001042995,0.00002071816,0.008032548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969794,0.00008646157,0.001487872,0.00006080994,0.00001122313,0.00005895875,0.0001290757,0.000002490149,0.001183884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004990084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02289993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1854872351424579,"score_gpt":0.4614854867086056,"score_spread":0.2759982515661477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}