{"id":"W162709221","doi":"10.1023/a:1026145321640","title":"Potential for climate change mitigation through afforestation: an economic analysis of fossil fuel substitution and carbon sequestration benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agroforestry Systems","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Fossil fuel; Environmental science; Renewable energy; Waste management; Biomass (ecology); Renewable fuels; Raw material; Ethanol fuel; Gasoline; Biofuel; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781104,0.0001357624,0.0001992312,0.00008918854,0.0001085039,0.00006082261,0.00008001803,0.00009158324,0.00004138724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007291505,0.0001343157,0.00006298975,0.0002272621,0.0001054407,0.0006963467,0.00001966296,0.00003123049,0.0000113922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009539331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000942499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003437595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989665,0.00006150475,0.0003198285,0.0002785233,0.0001444857,0.0002291142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994714,0.00001957852,0.0002383626,0.0001994196,0.00001194437,0.0000593432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004968863,0.00007258235,0.6054057,0.0003238108,0.0002153455,0.000002030158,0.001483781,0.1697375,0.0004717986,0.2210609,0.00009648904,0.001080367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006455224,0.0002293474,0.5973486,0.00003583417,0.0006457634,0.000005373239,0.0002165482,0.398023,0.0002064958,0.001409275,0.0009219538,0.0003122604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944643,0.0001526186,0.0002734325,0.00003308522,0.0002565335,0.0006306067,0.00006696458,0.00002717195,0.004095261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.0001202226,0.0002043226,0.00001209205,0.0001078032,0.0001155853,0.0002425939,0.00001009412,0.00006680575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2282854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5477234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02188113151288566,"score_gpt":0.2531580400010432,"score_spread":0.2312769084881575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}