{"id":"W1641855109","doi":"10.1109/iecon.1996.571027","title":"An inspection strategy for randomly failing systems subjected to random shocks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Computer science; Censoring (clinical trials); Electric power system; Process (computing); ALARM; Transient (computer programming); Critical system; Stochastic process; Automotive industry; Real-time computing; Engineering; Power (physics); Mathematics; Statistics; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005453273,0.000302959,0.0003234408,0.0004044954,0.0001850353,0.0003198747,0.0004792692,0.0003854364,0.0007855061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002490598,0.0001977199,0.0001648434,0.0002337504,0.0003406675,0.0003473781,0.0002624827,0.0002673329,0.0001215267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003363571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003424909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001062007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008611295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997273,0.0001019039,0.00001396113,0.00004418293,0.00007229616,0.00004028829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.0004843236,0.0001787311,0.0000735616,0.0002022781,0.00005419428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003188176,0.00009275121,0.002086438,0.0000860972,0.00002843124,0.0003129187,0.0001716944,0.8738269,0.02629819,0.009844939,0.0008690841,0.08606382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001755405,0.0001824012,0.0004935104,0.000004383681,0.00001053633,0.00005818841,0.0000166906,0.9943474,0.002765779,0.00182973,0.0002681097,0.000005698933],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.200686,0.0001739247,0.7962635,0.0001432475,0.00001478277,0.00007058352,0.00002621879,0.0004365646,0.002185265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545476,0.00005807268,0.04443856,0.00002443745,0.000006111151,0.00003259717,0.00001986303,0.00002147167,0.000851314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001062007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002883971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01666052285423077,"score_gpt":0.2223959065983925,"score_spread":0.2057353837441617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}