{"id":"W1644774079","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.148589","title":"Optimal quality choice under uncertainty on market development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Duopoly; Microeconomics; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Stackelberg competition; Profit (economics); Ambiguity; Monopoly; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Financial economics; Cournot competition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001630318,0.0003596445,0.0009524091,0.000658891,0.0002883528,0.0000586815,0.0008215647,0.0004230603,0.008795707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004838872,0.0004722798,0.0004947745,0.0002799886,0.0002819418,0.0002695275,0.0009479814,0.0006773483,0.001562461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005343627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008203824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001976169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976832,0.0001218612,0.0005723605,0.0008358545,0.0002022916,0.0005844596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979232,0.0002362101,0.0006485556,0.0007796412,0.0001167324,0.0002956562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001213492,0.004427776,0.215914,0.002954752,0.008445493,0.0001224924,0.02981358,0.04609013,0.0001451383,0.6187223,0.05850591,0.01364493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002521003,0.0001807901,0.8336228,0.0002552804,0.0001876003,0.000002449735,0.005420462,0.009654082,0.0001839787,0.00554575,0.1402033,0.002222514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738562,0.002122986,0.0007535198,0.0009258079,0.0003350143,0.0003365422,0.0004338711,0.00003280196,0.02120324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631277,0.002533234,0.003610437,0.0001522952,0.0001353921,0.000002507709,0.0003293038,0.0000338678,0.03007527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1020580636003593,"score_gpt":0.2714693108140507,"score_spread":0.1694112472136915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}