{"id":"W1644797908","doi":"10.1007/s10107-016-0979-5","title":"On the mixing set with a knapsack constraint","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Knapsack problem; Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Continuous knapsack problem; Constraint (computer-aided design); Polytope; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Change-making problem; Discrete mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005238913,0.002511627,0.002963721,0.002205678,0.001236956,0.004869586,0.002997827,0.00351942,0.01047906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02066442,0.00177438,0.002203058,0.002853137,0.002991151,0.007321774,0.005805627,0.00634605,0.001343748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001547266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001244213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001859283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001153799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965577,0.001850509,0.0001395057,0.0004917188,0.0007017662,0.0002588917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902673,0.007326364,0.0007127986,0.0006472526,0.0004952686,0.0005510193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001685937,0.0001170235,0.0004665859,0.0001975902,0.0001163207,0.0001425682,0.0000883001,0.4157305,0.001180463,0.5571728,0.003466377,0.02115296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002256935,0.00005414111,0.0001720404,0.00005507096,0.0000233713,0.00004849976,0.00001935896,0.690343,0.0005166577,0.3070948,0.001618152,0.00003224691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01910403,0.0004514618,0.9610594,0.0008929139,0.000112639,0.00007305303,0.0002268253,0.00007882406,0.01800088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4579743,0.001631182,0.5035754,0.000837796,0.0007526782,0.0007864621,0.0009400038,0.0005551047,0.03294697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01047906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03505594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09817941881720438,"score_gpt":0.351488615016236,"score_spread":0.2533091961990316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}