{"id":"W1645899604","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1210.3344","title":"Galois correspondence for counting quantifiers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Mathematics; Closure operator; Galois connection; Operator (biology); Type (biology); Set (abstract data type); Partial function; Discrete mathematics; Constraint satisfaction problem; Counting problem; Closed set; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000357096,0.0002146531,0.000209112,0.0002188254,0.0002068812,0.0001635743,0.0008786252,0.000227104,0.00008666979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007893797,0.0002677437,0.0001708986,0.0003515365,0.00008021546,0.0005602677,0.0005862897,0.0002920762,0.00007936004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001732736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002184499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004872648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003796754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986432,0.00006786859,0.0001737793,0.0007029467,0.00008055981,0.0003317063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998501,0.0001907589,0.0002657266,0.000682469,0.0002212972,0.0001387246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006945764,0.00007695134,0.01388115,0.0001835342,0.0001017814,0.00003522779,0.0007046918,0.3362232,0.0001334588,0.6390046,0.00199657,0.00758933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003678747,0.00001562932,0.002509958,0.0000692973,0.00004974905,0.000005289381,0.00008556397,0.9874837,0.0001095092,0.006254085,0.002623469,0.0004258789],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02431623,0.00004064992,0.9715943,0.0001000684,0.001806507,0.0003524222,0.00001963562,0.000252952,0.00151722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863649,0.00007005238,0.01146215,0.0001105533,0.00007904612,0.000001886964,0.00002206818,0.0000129482,0.001876395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09763686629699236,"score_gpt":0.2050159710686429,"score_spread":0.1073791047716506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}