{"id":"W1648763540","doi":"10.1063/1.2435088","title":"Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Multipartite entanglement; Bipartite graph; Squashed entanglement; Mathematics; Multipartite; Upper and lower bounds; Qubit; Kullback–Leibler divergence; W state; Quantum mechanics; Discrete mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics; Quantum; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Graph","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365659,0.00007928986,0.0001848581,0.00005892546,0.00004783192,0.00006415419,0.0003078634,0.00002804467,0.00001336671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006988701,0.00005888504,0.0002048137,0.0001836971,0.0000251313,0.0005058027,0.00004853554,0.0001021735,0.00001838689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002533054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003069831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.106759e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.706859e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987351,0.00001534894,0.0006284327,0.00005654146,0.0003899671,0.0001745522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988571,0.0002644886,0.0003746868,0.000171259,0.0002174332,0.0001150212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001486557,0.0002254147,0.00002903456,0.0000548807,0.00002750459,0.000003061709,0.0008574543,0.00001309746,0.0002071663,0.9785339,0.001684316,0.01834934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007734615,0.0002812021,0.0002668238,0.00004067125,0.00001677866,0.00003657917,0.0002394273,0.01048304,0.007829179,0.9759432,0.003964866,0.0001247491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02542417,0.00001213042,0.9722351,0.0003519621,0.0001586775,0.00009374091,0.000001302511,0.00001676856,0.001706101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7287819,0.000003115889,0.2703694,0.0005383745,0.0002852285,0.00000211583,6.009689e-7,0.000005555524,0.00001370204],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7033577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2401262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03616450334825212,"score_gpt":0.3082688273788878,"score_spread":0.2721043240306357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}