{"id":"W1649407205","doi":"10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.4346","title":"Feasibility of improving cone‐beam CT number consistency using a scatter correction algorithm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"St. John’s Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Cone beam computed tomography; Imaging phantom; Hounsfield scale; Consistency (knowledge bases); Cone beam ct; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Nuclear medicine; Computed tomography; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009129117,0.00019825,0.0007853325,0.00002672837,0.0000644804,0.00002149415,0.0002818616,0.000102024,0.0009643746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001058772,0.0001576853,0.0004149493,0.0001643901,0.0004872755,0.0002220378,0.00006774651,0.0009974581,0.00000951882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006559418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003201846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007677294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.698704e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972392,0.00008180461,0.001568617,0.0002388409,0.0006189401,0.0002526314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996985,0.0007087275,0.001360588,0.000282393,0.0003512071,0.0003120871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008573258,0.001338006,0.06386292,0.00003019999,0.0002709139,0.000004620928,0.00006147924,0.00003270209,0.003013609,0.0008550105,0.00158394,0.9288608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03020526,0.003010982,0.03927825,0.002125812,0.001719497,0.0003438677,0.001903538,0.1352072,0.1344052,0.6442601,0.003694572,0.003845765],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.357602,0.00001683499,0.6398472,0.00008360475,0.00074624,0.0003154963,0.000005083685,0.00002130663,0.001362278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408532,0.0000123643,0.05685087,0.000327511,0.001899814,0.000008166031,0.000002366601,0.00003034783,0.0000153532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03461960992229625,"score_gpt":0.3649856168026474,"score_spread":0.3303660068803512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}