{"id":"W1655185394","doi":"10.1002/2015wr016892","title":"Water security and the science agenda","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Water security; Environmental resource management; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Integrated water resources management; Food security; Anthropocene; Environmental planning; Water resources; Business; Political science; Environmental science; Geography; Agriculture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007478439,0.00009271991,0.0001102199,0.00008774672,0.001063527,0.0001467383,0.0006069909,0.00003387725,0.0003938996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007490693,0.00003612435,0.00002019284,0.0001925276,0.00750687,0.0002094339,0.003284284,0.0002668773,0.001977887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006595279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002888406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009124086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005900333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975043,0.0003523788,0.0001128481,0.0003712499,0.0008747196,0.0007845177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00004691946,0.000007598725,0.0003180988,0.0000253682,0.0001322144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001618317,0.0002308874,0.08316497,0.00005877072,0.0001234153,0.0001970714,0.828778,0.001027871,0.02198366,0.001301315,0.05773273,0.003783002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002207527,0.0001751116,0.002964652,0.000006126857,0.00001419353,0.00001729704,0.004255515,0.001647196,0.05388077,0.03550273,0.8990732,0.0002557266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131618,0.00005044957,0.000002879181,0.009717886,0.00004584435,0.0002406275,4.202357e-7,0.00002213621,0.07675799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946866,0.00002133924,0.00001485966,0.0002874029,0.00003992269,0.00003728828,0.000001017352,0.000006321197,0.004905233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8413404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0596786375858516,"score_gpt":0.3155966571812453,"score_spread":0.2559180195953937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}