{"id":"W1655294445","doi":"10.1016/j.jalgebra.2015.06.004","title":"Independence in computable algebra","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Algebra","topic":"Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; David and Lucile Packard Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Computable number; Computable analysis; Abelian group; Computable function; Algebra over a field; Independence (probability theory); Pure mathematics; Algebraic number; Torsion (gastropod); Cover (algebra); Basis (linear algebra); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002550393,0.0002142604,0.0004933808,0.0004429056,0.00004485949,0.000252866,0.002103654,0.0001315132,0.00002859533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003505967,0.0001857611,0.0001440978,0.001124084,0.00007272004,0.001479634,0.0006485455,0.000684457,0.00007004989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002896866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000616556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006382653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002353356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996955,0.0002362047,0.0008835893,0.0003391817,0.001128685,0.0004572854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976798,0.0002384133,0.0004828516,0.0005617091,0.0006288574,0.0004083706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003311877,0.0040783,0.2170189,0.0001303327,0.0002984222,0.00810966,0.01510253,0.07295936,0.0009559256,0.1729802,0.03019786,0.4778373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005489991,0.002099181,0.06355253,0.000227739,0.00002745506,0.005672195,0.0005138421,0.2479034,0.001566259,0.6601262,0.01173884,0.001082329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4208663,0.0009894732,0.5708337,0.002822835,0.002088403,0.0001685465,6.554004e-7,0.00007840076,0.002151785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060402,0.00002191013,0.09308599,0.0004284188,0.0003246331,0.000001583922,2.739729e-7,0.0000128701,0.00008410342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.487146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7575117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03148040757211418,"score_gpt":0.2649083728170514,"score_spread":0.2334279652449373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}