{"id":"W1657709721","doi":"10.1029/2003wr002596","title":"Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flathead; Status quo; Conflict resolution; Conflict analysis; Compromise; Operations research; Drainage basin; Politics; Conflict management; Decision maker; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Fishery; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739038,0.00009595839,0.0003722434,0.0006486366,0.0002138519,0.00006810181,0.0005341483,0.00008234975,0.0003862616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001219979,0.00006192334,0.0002355427,0.0009952871,0.0003980858,0.00006205464,0.0002077544,0.0002823096,0.0005852078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009454638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001015181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004063124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001054337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983522,0.0001577189,0.0004665888,0.000309368,0.0001533451,0.0005607862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990017,0.00008941634,0.0001083067,0.0006440929,0.0000735625,0.00008288169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769412,0.000323399,0.5649902,0.0001633244,0.002245458,0.00001154789,0.1663838,0.01217511,0.003341305,0.2494721,0.0002343845,0.0004823704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00165229,0.00024165,0.2895302,0.00009090919,0.00009977955,0.00000358605,0.001637283,0.001326439,0.01859122,0.05861823,0.6277353,0.0004730361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789202,0.0005099406,0.00005829194,0.0003231081,0.00007808564,0.0001818756,0.00007276656,0.0000149746,0.01984071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938897,0.00002469781,0.00002070174,0.0000286881,0.00005213187,0.00001200776,0.000006656512,0.0000150129,0.00595038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.627501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1098090322574266,"score_gpt":0.3146804596086147,"score_spread":0.2048714273511881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}