{"id":"W1657709721","doi":"10.1029/2003wr002596","title":"Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flathead; Status quo; Conflict resolution; Conflict analysis; Compromise; Operations research; Drainage basin; Politics; Conflict management; Decision maker; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Fishery; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002683393,0.0002409728,0.000478357,0.001532333,0.0009548691,0.002193398,0.0008876426,0.0008385537,0.006342542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364811,0.0001893179,0.0003924933,0.001551566,0.001877377,0.002627065,0.0008937364,0.000901199,0.0002802882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002034801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001365596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01229808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00758391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.0006421217,0.00004082564,0.0001027114,0.0002417213,0.000189561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929275,0.005033058,0.0008218201,0.0002248047,0.0007191322,0.0002737981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001844146,0.00007038844,0.005597465,0.00006381605,0.00003105564,0.0001913964,0.0005552258,0.2525538,0.000747505,0.7072058,0.003065264,0.02973402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001892888,0.00002701247,0.00142812,0.000009057592,0.000009407149,0.00002164236,0.0002704932,0.7843724,0.0001916543,0.2122659,0.001373596,0.00001181572],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6510196,0.0005320496,0.2800115,0.003207356,0.0001042835,0.0001979142,0.0004580527,0.0001310061,0.06433821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873179,0.0001259454,0.008059858,0.00004433694,0.00002872913,0.00004279954,0.0001081943,0.00001573752,0.004256492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01229808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02445298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1098090322574266,"score_gpt":0.3146804596086147,"score_spread":0.2048714273511881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}