{"id":"W1659401276","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00934.x","title":"The effects of interference on recognition of haptic pictures in blindfolded sighted participants: The modality of representation of haptic information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Psychology","topic":"Tactile and Sensory Interactions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Haptic technology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Modalities; Interference (communication); Stereotaxy; Representation (politics); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109482,0.0004660551,0.0004214949,0.0003038186,0.0001824689,0.0004156241,0.0002459876,0.0005244731,0.002544335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01198258,0.0003353217,0.0002531581,0.00008374402,0.0006125788,0.0005241435,0.0006519495,0.000506663,0.0002766465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001273127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001517356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001134575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007985621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993743,0.0001470764,0.00009263102,0.0001267989,0.0001940982,0.00006500559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913488,0.00551631,0.001304217,0.0007221802,0.0006353444,0.0004731449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02804468,0.001062958,0.1043213,0.0005143015,0.0001943992,0.001140883,0.006878036,0.0002375797,0.8101025,0.00009381359,0.0004200878,0.04698942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003142594,0.008985768,0.8952816,0.00003795136,0.0001345632,0.002049021,0.001462333,0.00107465,0.08985134,0.0003144642,0.0004264775,0.00006751175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994543,0.00009539041,0.00019687,0.00001139935,0.000004531381,0.00000818037,0.00002091999,0.000004591328,0.000203745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992816,0.00006384352,0.0004214782,0.00001855074,0.000004711162,0.00001411364,0.0000328733,0.000003714314,0.0001591409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002544335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008511662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0843562204122439,"score_gpt":0.3736464367033038,"score_spread":0.2892902162910599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}