{"id":"W1659725686","doi":"","title":"CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada: Case Comment on a Landmark Copyright Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Landmark; Law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Copyright law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Property rights; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121922,0.0006798179,0.0006025485,0.001837339,0.02762015,0.008591592,0.004495357,0.03791381,0.01025395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075105,0.0009675818,0.0008848824,0.003933916,0.006746143,0.002928579,0.002125462,0.01510207,0.001243422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07405747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1621185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943045,0.0002773589,0.0001489146,0.0006462347,0.002313701,0.002309296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946331,0.0022258,0.0002118319,0.0001804632,0.001951075,0.0007976981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006266329,0.00003606514,0.002820109,0.0001369362,0.00001869346,0.002831593,0.007955728,0.0004245722,0.0006771209,0.2727511,0.7015114,0.01077395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004760251,0.00002574655,0.004427365,0.0002571025,0.00006560676,0.0003981804,0.005053141,0.0004887255,0.000714549,0.008974888,0.9793838,0.0001634103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03593354,0.007167282,0.001156076,0.5768176,0.002947716,0.0002758096,0.001158927,0.0002039349,0.3743392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1888669,0.00518242,0.001035105,0.5057808,0.001134662,0.0002295163,0.0002483978,0.0001346522,0.2973876],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07405747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02500410964801183,"score_gpt":0.2528883158151268,"score_spread":0.2278842061671149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}