{"id":"W1660591014","doi":"10.1109/pesgm.2015.7285882","title":"An improved harmonic contribution estimation using nonlinear optimization techniques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power Quality and Harmonics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro One (Canada); Kinectrics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; MATLAB; Harmonic; Computer science; Harmonic analysis; Range (aeronautics); Software; Focus (optics); Voltage; Electronic engineering; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Acoustics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005716308,0.0007769083,0.0006383753,0.0004932099,0.0002539028,0.0005371348,0.0004890605,0.0004045114,0.001258212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001317056,0.0002990986,0.0005936589,0.0004470073,0.0003120959,0.0007628676,0.0005230628,0.0005908287,0.0004948753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002746764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000520126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003490732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003040615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997252,0.00009432064,0.00001264481,0.00005283561,0.00009941612,0.0000156815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996549,0.0001719737,0.00004407595,0.00002781551,0.00009396664,0.00000723738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001521638,0.00007029861,0.001838526,0.0001942679,0.00009249678,0.0001105089,0.0001370788,0.6808861,0.03027501,0.006026572,0.001250055,0.2789668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004272558,0.00001189709,0.000303978,0.000003960547,0.000007227569,0.0000175244,0.000004961569,0.9965181,0.002196482,0.0005201914,0.0004047411,0.000006578887],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008740694,0.00009324158,0.9898028,0.00004307614,0.0000125587,0.00001481356,0.0000206537,0.0001539251,0.0011182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3277271,0.0003715071,0.6659721,0.00006350254,0.00005376049,0.00009262255,0.0001619532,0.0001386568,0.005418767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003490732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006940842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03791690369833237,"score_gpt":0.2962159430295309,"score_spread":0.2582990393311985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}