{"id":"W1662857842","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1238","title":"Assessing the Impact of the Ancillary Powers Doctrine on Three Decades of Charter Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Doctrine; Common law; Context (archaeology); Unavailability; Constitutional review; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04038751,0.0003969152,0.001090998,0.007804622,0.009790336,0.01289029,0.003819638,0.006655104,0.004428485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1156179,0.0007406175,0.00103793,0.008769483,0.01661429,0.009796926,0.004580947,0.01104275,0.0004051064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06228938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06231203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4589079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5831897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.962024,0.006466051,0.0009593119,0.002303234,0.0242177,0.004029681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8665819,0.0889753,0.01093884,0.005352544,0.02492797,0.003223519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290582,0.0001455003,0.01002648,0.0001795005,0.00008225825,0.0004649624,0.007000145,0.0010816,0.0003253964,0.9301991,0.006618887,0.04374717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812731,0.0008247641,0.168293,0.003776625,0.0006505512,0.0005127985,0.0147865,0.006097245,0.004088823,0.2961244,0.5041603,0.0004037652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4223493,0.04534852,0.005473928,0.09370828,0.001424021,0.0001933321,0.0004852421,0.00007544908,0.4309419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591793,0.01033956,0.001447895,0.01483208,0.000715767,0.00007168945,0.0001508071,0.00005165301,0.01321116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5410921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0864488825808428,"score_gpt":0.4299096642051603,"score_spread":0.3434607816243175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}