{"id":"W1663267617","doi":"10.1109/tie.2015.2432107","title":"Fault-Tolerant Attitude Stabilization for Satellites Without Rate Sensor","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Angular velocity; Attitude control; Actuator; Observer (physics); Fault tolerance; Controller (irrigation); Computer science; Mode (computer interface); Engineering; Control engineering; Control (management); Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003623473,0.0002392619,0.0002866919,0.0001413132,0.0001289569,0.0000802621,0.0001093828,0.000288117,0.00002123194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002216587,0.0002396988,0.0001262097,0.0002988931,0.00002345359,0.0001494363,3.19432e-7,0.0004271241,0.00004945835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004300985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001607319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002302834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001643903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986587,0.00008793367,0.0003792659,0.0002397483,0.0002033974,0.0004309796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999327,0.0001055037,0.00005075481,0.0002289975,0.0001229944,0.0001647399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004545071,0.00006766883,0.00000675731,0.00002068651,0.0001493655,7.151715e-7,0.0001790454,0.9619276,0.01554648,0.00007403107,0.00066156,0.02091162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006288972,0.0007659316,0.000001744698,0.0000431999,0.0001264304,0.0000147289,0.0002357935,0.6718673,0.1688501,0.0001095868,0.151174,0.0005222408],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1103405,0.0003044423,0.8820484,0.0001539277,0.00452554,0.001299702,0.00007839993,0.0008405893,0.0004084976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983197,0.00006446066,0.0001544387,0.00004507006,0.0003820645,0.0002410212,0.00001117341,0.00006984983,0.000712199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04405617945128126,"score_gpt":0.2572809728137775,"score_spread":0.2132247933624963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}