{"id":"W1665251036","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093013","title":"Computable entanglement conversion witness that is better than the negativity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Entanglement witness; Witness; Physics; Negativity effect; Qubit; State (computer science); Quantum mechanics; Quantum; Theoretical physics; Statistical physics; Squashed entanglement; Computer science; Algorithm; Law; Political science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003257112,0.00008747305,0.0001273642,0.00003872476,0.00008357789,0.0001573686,0.0006302292,0.00002066346,0.000014596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003704527,0.00005470692,0.0001153806,0.000258582,0.00004274003,0.001172176,0.0001177474,0.000159317,0.00003279276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003206521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000173632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.872852e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00005174163,0.0001961494,0.00006521806,0.0005634553,0.000137157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990882,0.00003908509,0.0003339683,0.0002168801,0.0001784075,0.0001434763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008481744,0.0003904416,0.03028407,0.00004095366,0.000297867,0.000023416,0.03388435,0.002021757,0.000440541,0.1538766,0.5031112,0.275544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007882874,0.00126526,0.01140851,0.0002130926,0.0001298442,0.0002238353,0.003206352,0.1286507,0.1362094,0.4222707,0.2877119,0.0008275951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127892,0.00006574664,0.8791126,0.006299956,0.0007088897,0.00006260214,0.000001015761,0.0000157031,0.0009442425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910792,0.000009239189,0.005097384,0.003515575,0.0002608317,3.108061e-7,4.927946e-7,0.000003510066,0.00003350532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8782899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2230884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03854286892073975,"score_gpt":0.2529615391646767,"score_spread":0.214418670243937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}