{"id":"W1665251036","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093013","title":"Computable entanglement conversion witness that is better than the negativity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Entanglement witness; Witness; Physics; Negativity effect; Qubit; State (computer science); Quantum mechanics; Quantum; Theoretical physics; Statistical physics; Squashed entanglement; Computer science; Algorithm; Law; Political science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234985,0.0005097234,0.0009732688,0.0008677883,0.0009746258,0.003513438,0.0008342027,0.001176919,0.004183841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01696945,0.0003912926,0.001040309,0.0007572034,0.003402679,0.009463129,0.003253097,0.002940731,0.000398308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007752839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009588837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003097659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000196132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980179,0.0004444766,0.0001668047,0.0006324254,0.0004953806,0.0002429967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886298,0.007858104,0.0005553275,0.001918179,0.0007008031,0.0003377647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004312998,0.00009086607,0.002343011,0.0002664884,0.00006289531,0.0004748756,0.0004894929,0.01572642,0.02051595,0.9265128,0.001674465,0.03141134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004532742,0.0001418328,0.0006429694,0.000070319,0.00005922809,0.0005739732,0.000206308,0.08963966,0.031815,0.8718721,0.004863691,0.00006949804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3144418,0.0007206735,0.6581114,0.001858284,0.0003000412,0.0001236976,0.0004551065,0.00114551,0.02284352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456851,0.0001995062,0.0508612,0.0002736464,0.0001004589,0.00006722481,0.0002736503,0.0001603805,0.002378789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004183841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0139963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03854286892073975,"score_gpt":0.2529615391646767,"score_spread":0.214418670243937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}