{"id":"W1667976067","doi":"10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00782.x","title":"The paradox of energy equivalence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Grantová Agentura České Republiky; Sight Research UK; McGill University","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Null (SQL); Null hypothesis; Ecology; Null model; Population; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Physics; Pure mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761711,0.0003349763,0.001058188,0.001419576,0.0008840422,0.00248622,0.001328583,0.001811781,0.003507278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03597165,0.0002881451,0.0006018569,0.0009717645,0.01137398,0.006624254,0.002733153,0.003053575,0.0003674701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009666479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000434405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005069982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000173923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951007,0.002225744,0.000281553,0.0008867026,0.001280632,0.0002246869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744101,0.01949237,0.001895431,0.002381522,0.001449963,0.0003704597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008522544,0.00002973538,0.003460921,0.00008201696,0.00005642757,0.0001845674,0.0003821343,0.003404321,0.0007167314,0.9686512,0.002589168,0.02035757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008479195,0.00002026678,0.001885242,0.00002317116,0.000007589836,0.0001435551,0.0001054449,0.003860597,0.0002381972,0.9906054,0.003088078,0.0000139152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5373785,0.01197203,0.2661058,0.06624289,0.00222664,0.00004333009,0.0006520837,0.0003284631,0.1150503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914459,0.0007585077,0.003612555,0.002190888,0.0005544975,0.00003082254,0.00007339124,0.00003647534,0.001296853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007761711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04104835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007906457108445212,"score_gpt":0.2121484813733143,"score_spread":0.2042420242648691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}