{"id":"W1668335797","doi":"10.25959/23209157","title":"Improving the theory and practice of community engagement in Australian forest management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies; University of Tasmania","keywords":"Forest management; Certified wood; Certification; Environmental resource management; Legislation; Community forestry; Best practice; Community engagement; Business; Public relations; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006698777,0.0001741382,0.0001959544,0.0001018127,0.0002740265,0.00004604965,0.0006161929,0.00009287761,0.0001155961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005682137,0.0001774309,0.00008468122,0.0001788121,0.0003031667,0.000710652,0.0004990608,0.0003282878,0.00003407657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008102418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008217624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004441926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001292445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988462,0.0003122046,0.0002020471,0.0001878802,0.000274879,0.0001767608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0002436572,0.0004574402,0.0004422237,0.00001671695,0.0000480729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01131775,0.005296259,0.2725123,0.00723888,0.00278445,0.001128011,0.2283272,0.00149473,0.003541914,0.09117602,0.04279579,0.3323868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001085244,0.0004179813,0.8464183,0.0003140679,0.0005825808,0.00001588993,0.1026344,0.00008016027,0.0001916571,0.002164298,0.04544675,0.0006486775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6541137,0.0000200004,0.000008673087,0.00001655162,0.0000825216,0.0002880116,0.000008854164,0.0000100734,0.3454517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178297,0.00004185206,0.0001676307,0.00001636295,0.000008911004,0.000001066259,0.00006046792,0.00001302646,0.08186097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.573906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7235423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01842259396519976,"score_gpt":0.2187491214965007,"score_spread":0.200326527531301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}