{"id":"W1668335797","doi":"10.25959/23209157","title":"Improving the theory and practice of community engagement in Australian forest management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies; University of Tasmania","keywords":"Forest management; Certified wood; Certification; Environmental resource management; Legislation; Community forestry; Best practice; Community engagement; Business; Public relations; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04254577,0.0005267501,0.0007609969,0.002990865,0.01467894,0.01271674,0.003649491,0.004134977,0.004649104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04297132,0.000705617,0.0007214679,0.002811916,0.03289087,0.01104969,0.01999256,0.00638879,0.0005942279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02115803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03292952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04011003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04062179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9348539,0.05305396,0.001416394,0.002579036,0.005273659,0.002823011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574303,0.02861084,0.002487259,0.002936013,0.003973666,0.004561932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003844881,0.0003356078,0.007261664,0.001319319,0.00002723794,0.0006394058,0.6169116,0.000805904,0.000547678,0.2072659,0.004183127,0.1606642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003936439,0.0004590197,0.01864054,0.005699049,0.00004804067,0.000517062,0.3606587,0.005255364,0.000721344,0.2880076,0.3197985,0.0001554677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3787243,0.01925938,0.1088223,0.1629215,0.001645327,0.001819366,0.00006841968,0.0002061542,0.3265333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668936,0.003927595,0.01847106,0.00355765,0.00008992416,0.000610969,0.00002026757,0.00003457415,0.006394451],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04254577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2250062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01842259396519976,"score_gpt":0.2187491214965007,"score_spread":0.200326527531301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}