{"id":"W1676350812","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720100603.023","title":"Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Gauge Students’ Reading Comprehension Performance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Educational Assessment and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Competence (human resources); Humanities; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007630527,0.0009883968,0.000557483,0.008325537,0.001191503,0.002465083,0.0009349493,0.001544972,0.003561245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02344231,0.0003073033,0.0009535485,0.00447509,0.001071102,0.00358116,0.002041857,0.00113132,0.001653003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002151854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00306551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003103064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992413,0.001797313,0.001872865,0.0004204808,0.003179586,0.0003168104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725521,0.01091804,0.004663312,0.001384005,0.009623473,0.0008589901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004820564,0.0006276399,0.5253587,0.002107824,0.0001885038,0.0004730144,0.01649816,0.004386154,0.01704551,0.02017405,0.01093272,0.4017257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009784281,0.00273477,0.7732657,0.001724619,0.000144764,0.001646278,0.02071552,0.01470426,0.02048144,0.0501146,0.1139934,0.0003768919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7604332,0.005275339,0.1317833,0.00234865,0.0002569524,0.004499723,0.004970258,0.001179427,0.08925305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870422,0.003130834,0.1877903,0.0003043065,0.00004976818,0.004526007,0.003942834,0.0001011484,0.01311265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008325537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04035455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1205756364962129,"score_gpt":0.4225739880762213,"score_spread":0.3019983515800084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}