{"id":"W1677888577","doi":"10.1007/3-540-45821-2_8","title":"Architectural Refactoring in Framework Evolution: A Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Code refactoring; Computer science; Software engineering; Software product line; Programming language; Architecture; Object-oriented programming; Software architecture; Domain (mathematical analysis); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Software development; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001248737,0.0006577403,0.0007055661,0.001402395,0.0002059483,0.0003068903,0.00286932,0.0003544133,0.000008924178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009914179,0.0006231488,0.0001097461,0.001233764,0.0003860861,0.0005918299,0.001784701,0.002141706,0.00001490031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009200163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001892399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009325038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001448881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956489,0.0001194005,0.0006382566,0.001834555,0.0008802876,0.0008785735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949102,0.002688072,0.0002156707,0.001908249,0.0001211133,0.0001566312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003207611,0.00004496292,0.000534529,0.00002663221,0.000008856443,0.007341771,0.004436695,0.6258923,0.000007624776,0.003950158,5.850179e-7,0.3577527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006492844,0.0007165671,0.001492894,0.001073795,0.00001268877,0.007134928,0.000006491413,0.3180874,0.0001201473,0.6685155,0.0001028596,0.002087462],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002736429,0.0005605217,0.9928228,0.0001127569,0.002542825,0.0005799181,0.000001437562,0.0004974791,0.0001458872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3833529,0.000005693113,0.6162331,0.00006699406,0.0002441075,0.00001400428,2.056074e-7,0.00002713752,0.00005584586],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05058753024764497,"score_gpt":0.3035502522059936,"score_spread":0.2529627219583486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}