{"id":"W1677923143","doi":"10.1029/2010gl045459","title":"Deepening of the nutricline and chlorophyll maximum in the Canada Basin interior, 2003–2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Photic zone; Upwelling; Oceanography; Deep chlorophyll maximum; Stratification (seeds); Ocean gyre; New production; Mixed layer; Canada Basin; Nitrate; Geology; Halocline; Environmental science; Arctic; Chlorophyll a; Phytoplankton; Nutrient; Salinity; Chemistry; Subtropics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006743674,0.00008568792,0.0001243547,0.00004435707,0.0001991332,0.00004116302,0.0005109903,0.00003145105,0.000108276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000404174,0.00004614825,0.00002829501,0.0006262129,0.0004565866,0.00007909747,0.00005910177,0.0009114238,0.000009328674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007388481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001954133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6254221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5403893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983902,0.0002071376,0.0001562628,0.0001778259,0.0006507258,0.0004178374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989318,0.000638234,0.00003702477,0.0002541009,0.00006406133,0.00007477197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001759427,0.00006389615,0.9180484,0.00007663271,0.00002400433,0.0001312308,0.001539758,0.00007501616,0.009376023,0.0007431839,0.006068624,0.06367722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002030813,0.00005324992,0.9898533,0.00001966325,0.000003742236,0.00001043001,0.0005585823,0.004158863,0.0001026765,0.0007051101,0.004250003,0.00008129623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863541,0.00001361442,0.00001629304,0.01282424,0.0001895031,0.0001723615,0.00002684828,0.000002461891,0.0004005723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973965,0.00001108266,0.0001551065,0.002229082,0.0001330814,0.000001574195,0.000007273875,0.000002607119,0.00006374838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08503272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4679974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01250953196842929,"score_gpt":0.2402022211853386,"score_spread":0.2276926892169093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}