{"id":"W1677923143","doi":"10.1029/2010gl045459","title":"Deepening of the nutricline and chlorophyll maximum in the Canada Basin interior, 2003–2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Photic zone; Upwelling; Oceanography; Deep chlorophyll maximum; Stratification (seeds); Ocean gyre; New production; Mixed layer; Canada Basin; Nitrate; Geology; Halocline; Environmental science; Arctic; Chlorophyll a; Phytoplankton; Nutrient; Salinity; Chemistry; Subtropics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513715,0.0002864567,0.0003248915,0.001362982,0.002298837,0.001539475,0.0006064464,0.0004209144,0.00163396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007897565,0.0002361369,0.0002976021,0.002174553,0.000685445,0.0003298702,0.0006747919,0.0005657058,0.0002063146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03420788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03366526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997932,0.000004006543,0.000007771748,0.00004119217,0.00007700343,0.00007686263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.00001964734,0.0001054397,0.00002398162,0.0006954421,0.0002412158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002524348,0.00005199216,0.9638378,0.0001056106,0.0001468391,0.0002551553,0.001570693,0.0006565712,0.003310597,0.000545462,0.01009203,0.01917489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002847376,0.000003302957,0.9962828,0.0000130563,0.000009608382,0.00001765491,0.0003477298,0.0001512755,0.000121939,0.00001247604,0.003032168,0.000005113369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752607,0.001630676,0.0001238511,0.0009834815,0.00004255108,0.00002163535,0.01368099,0.00004851396,0.008207604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897172,0.0006807187,0.0002801334,0.0002061807,0.00001024449,0.00001014871,0.005559577,0.00001320211,0.00352257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03420788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2481967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01250953196842929,"score_gpt":0.2402022211853386,"score_spread":0.2276926892169093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}