{"id":"W1701436674","doi":"","title":"Drawing Analogies in Environmental Education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of environmental education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Analogy; Illusion; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental education; Element (criminal law); Kinship; Repertoire; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Ecology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Biology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005653807,0.0002376628,0.0002374626,0.0002960433,0.0002050148,0.00005934839,0.0004143462,0.0001147167,0.008561765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001382033,0.0002524899,0.0001183347,0.0001911896,0.0004944147,0.0006474595,0.00005072235,0.0003261265,0.0003306822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003442693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006917471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003002542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003050889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981033,0.0001832852,0.0006238658,0.0003287566,0.000332197,0.0004286559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998573,0.00005391937,0.0002959136,0.0003578228,0.000003401663,0.0007159521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009519193,0.0006375926,0.8176764,0.000008377355,0.000007455068,0.000002963186,0.002033475,0.0005861399,0.002288756,0.0001466681,0.002897345,0.1737053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002446088,0.00009381247,0.8940274,0.00002855899,0.00001656759,0.00006888944,0.008209268,0.00004181695,0.0002717888,0.001841961,0.09489802,0.0002573808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843836,0.000544577,0.00005216723,0.0008549909,0.0009452456,0.0002450242,0.000008491302,0.000005284741,0.01296065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960257,0.00007402946,0.001089601,0.001193855,0.0001601696,0.00002035838,0.00003147603,0.00002759447,0.001377165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1734479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003747284709451364,"score_gpt":0.2107045268379009,"score_spread":0.2069572421284495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}