{"id":"W1701991723","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n3p135","title":"Universal Civil Jurisdiction: An Option for Global Justice in Climate Change Litigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Jurisdiction; Political science; Climate justice; Political economy of climate change; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Global warming; International court; Small Island Developing States; International law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Public international law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004016052,0.00003579926,0.00006677172,0.00001948349,0.0001292051,0.00003422063,0.00004211419,0.00004847792,0.000004029099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001681919,0.00003470761,0.00002104805,0.00003852922,0.0001056007,0.000381246,0.000008407502,0.00004251581,8.16405e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004768723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002004931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003833105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995055,0.00005658042,0.0001208488,0.00004114577,0.0001270959,0.0001488512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996448,0.00001967376,0.00008166152,0.00002579971,0.00004124555,0.0001868501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001307347,0.00002955531,0.001594527,0.00000795249,0.000001956872,0.000002213224,0.002991128,0.000006596988,0.000003629488,0.99489,0.00004387124,0.0004154443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002659968,0.001228214,0.03009009,0.0001121519,0.0001743048,0.00004010358,0.01971621,0.000487561,0.00004359009,0.2830357,0.6621645,0.000247579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319906,0.0002061801,0.0001816517,0.004129037,0.0006660739,0.0001423739,0.0000566318,0.000007520582,0.06261989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978504,0.0002047905,0.0003167489,0.0004393971,0.001131574,8.148382e-7,0.000002446478,0.00000243169,0.00005136151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7118543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.303087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04881126763271558,"score_gpt":0.3422052731140779,"score_spread":0.2933940054813624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}