{"id":"W1706821692","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v9i1.3045","title":"Book Review: Ways of Experiencing Information Literacy: Making the case for a relational approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Information literacy; Literacy; Key (lock); Relational theory; Relational model; Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Relational database; Artificial intelligence; Information retrieval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129016,0.0005975836,0.001176064,0.002396608,0.0006388154,0.00347489,0.0008041595,0.001841206,0.004883153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005514962,0.000287486,0.0004816848,0.005015481,0.002144217,0.003594514,0.001159575,0.003799968,0.001734437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001860244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004317311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005469176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0173295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986095,0.0005426099,0.00009517226,0.0001098655,0.0005740235,0.00006875415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956555,0.003359578,0.0002161655,0.00005776915,0.0005998068,0.0001112107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000338598,0.00002386726,0.0002400027,0.01205403,0.00007933599,0.0002674499,0.001599778,0.0003080932,0.0003954779,0.03000795,0.710983,0.2440071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006662861,0.0000259532,0.0005291906,0.008986739,0.00003839104,0.0006605478,0.0006487181,0.00004589796,0.00008384238,0.004258735,0.9846993,0.00001615016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002298989,0.9746537,0.000364539,0.01321444,0.004154522,0.000009491605,0.00003165096,0.00001151473,0.007330212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002930967,0.9812608,0.0004852548,0.006714677,0.003165549,0.00002841261,0.00005114728,0.00001816353,0.005345013],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005469176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01633573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09694475572086535,"score_gpt":0.3755623336405322,"score_spread":0.2786175779196668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}