{"id":"W1710148940","doi":"10.1016/j.comgeo.2015.06.005","title":"Approximating the bottleneck plane perfect matching of a point set","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Geometry","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Bottleneck; Matching (statistics); Plane (geometry); Combinatorics; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Algorithm; Computer science; Geometry; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001078125,0.0006884693,0.001096011,0.001607474,0.0003735614,0.001767083,0.001601809,0.001622932,0.004557091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006920856,0.0008333657,0.000633362,0.001444184,0.0008493779,0.002166988,0.002795991,0.001209563,0.001027067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001151314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002803932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991628,0.0001303261,0.00003920673,0.0001356043,0.0004255211,0.0001064936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987707,0.0005350175,0.0001187593,0.0002532864,0.0002378256,0.00008450191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007598851,0.0001764254,0.002894939,0.0002387901,0.00007540201,0.0003153599,0.0002140897,0.7340696,0.01264913,0.108998,0.004036649,0.1355717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001736506,0.00004090766,0.0001488153,0.000009742214,0.000006598692,0.00007303122,0.00002724221,0.9824513,0.002234055,0.01399429,0.0009909599,0.000005849631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09076804,0.0001774972,0.9010318,0.0001296543,0.00005400313,0.00007069189,0.0001729851,0.0005901588,0.007005226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6195539,0.0002110395,0.3749118,0.00006283316,0.00002570876,0.00008143011,0.0004046077,0.0002499402,0.004498708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004557091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01524502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03667188324158616,"score_gpt":0.2699802524633155,"score_spread":0.2333083692217294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}