{"id":"W1710148940","doi":"10.1016/j.comgeo.2015.06.005","title":"Approximating the bottleneck plane perfect matching of a point set","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Geometry","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Bottleneck; Matching (statistics); Plane (geometry); Combinatorics; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Algorithm; Computer science; Geometry; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001277072,0.0001578189,0.0002052346,0.0002833719,0.0001785066,0.0001368703,0.0006528493,0.00004998116,0.00001610131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002509589,0.0001245203,0.00008840641,0.001183877,0.00005839964,0.000422848,0.0002878132,0.0001687132,0.00005593822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005639509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002391233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002074238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001362262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981012,0.0001492967,0.0004628911,0.0003180784,0.0007499697,0.0002185888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982671,0.0006895502,0.0002585837,0.0003050007,0.0003624498,0.0001172792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001387622,0.0000771571,0.0004826785,0.00003716669,0.00004670447,0.000005362065,0.002154384,0.8822509,0.0001911299,0.09799137,0.00267971,0.01406956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007350286,0.0001646416,0.006365899,0.00004095359,0.00001358084,0.0001693011,0.0004079223,0.8331335,0.0007083159,0.1568321,0.00114966,0.0002791109],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2005741,0.0003040726,0.7965734,0.0009208284,0.0003713855,0.000156964,0.00001010233,0.00008139091,0.001007767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857766,0.000001594485,0.1415251,0.0003858997,0.0001496096,0.00001144168,0.0000684959,0.000008656585,0.00008316443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.657192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5077791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03667188324158616,"score_gpt":0.2699802524633155,"score_spread":0.2333083692217294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}