{"id":"W17120724","doi":"","title":"Innovation in Legal Studies Education: An Integrated Case Study Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Legal research; Legal education; Popularity; Empirical legal studies; Legal writing; Meaning (existential); Jury; Curriculum; Common law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01846129,0.000540294,0.0006214594,0.007048874,0.004274048,0.01009376,0.003738752,0.00432463,0.006729086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597813,0.0005302224,0.0006763258,0.004216971,0.01068192,0.009622903,0.01207272,0.003592804,0.0005123497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00684031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007397378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009148176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002175584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9771624,0.01804553,0.0005334764,0.0008368923,0.002351965,0.001069678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683575,0.02518496,0.00131631,0.00145219,0.001831504,0.001857484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006832799,0.002588274,0.006484502,0.0007121937,0.00002924447,0.001891164,0.05282441,0.003556777,0.001234519,0.6426969,0.005719574,0.282194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002742425,0.001184022,0.007866229,0.003650532,0.0001051682,0.002883427,0.1071956,0.05039426,0.004650178,0.5939951,0.2276587,0.0001426218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817818,0.006383862,0.4055845,0.03050118,0.0004885324,0.002781352,0.00009723622,0.0003501407,0.2720313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.804522,0.002370981,0.1814031,0.001359596,0.0001346609,0.001308757,0.0000562637,0.00003781161,0.008806807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01846129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09763378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2010502305038889,"score_gpt":0.5029591158194794,"score_spread":0.3019088853155905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}